Skip to content

Unit Economics

LTV:CAC and Payback Benchmarks for Indian D2C — by Category 2026

By Sylvr Founder's Desk

LTV:CAC compares what a customer brings in over their life with what it cost to win them. We do not publish a figure for LTV:CAC for Indian D2C yet. Payback varies more by category. The category benchmark sets the floor, not the goal.

Category benchmarks

LTV:CAC and payback differ by category. We do not publish a figure for LTV:CAC for beauty and skincare yet.

How to use these ranges

Category figures appear here once a graded source gives them; they are never computed from guesses. Use them as a starting point, then compare against your own cohorts by channel and acquisition month.

Questions founders ask

Is 2× LTV:CAC really unhealthy?

It depends on lifecycle. A brand growing fast can accept a lower ratio for a while, if it knows when the ratio will recover. For a steady-state brand, a low ratio points to pricing or retention.

Should I compare to my category or to Indian D2C average?

Category. Beauty and FMCG have fundamentally different economics; averaging across both produces misleading numbers.

How do these benchmarks change with quick commerce?

Adding Blinkit or Zepto tends to lower LTV:CAC, because quick-commerce customers churn faster than D2C-acquired ones. Track them as a separate cohort.

LTV:CAC and Payback Benchmarks for Indian D2C — by Category 2026 | Sylvr